Wouldn’t it be better if civilizations made another revolution after the revolution or returned to their old civilizations?
Just like the Yucatan revolution of the Mexican civilization, other civilizations should be able to make another revolution or return to their former civilization after the revolution. In this way, making a revolution first and then making another revolution or returning to the old civilization can make the game more fun and versatile. It can save the game from monotony.
in every civ except mexico the revolutions replace age V. Yucatan is a age 3 → age 4 revolution, so its replacig industrial age and not imperial age.
its also dangerous to stack different revolutions: imagine someone as dutch revolts to south africa, sends the 3rd factory and multiple times wanderlust, then revolts to indonesia and sends infinite elephants.
this mechanic would prohibit cool revolutions (like the french one) because devs would need to consider the balance problems of multiple unique cards stacked on top. So i prefere fleshed out revs instead of many medicore ones
edit: wtf, why does it censor “go b4ck to indonesi4”?
If anything, more revolutions should be like Revolutionary France with an actual deck and a shipment that sends you to Age V while staying in the revolution. Returning from the revolution to your original Civs should stay exclusive to Mexico.
Multi-revolution and returning would also make sense for Gran Colombia.
Eh, not really. Colombia was more of a case of more and more regions declaring independence and becoming separate states. None of them really became part of Colombia again to this day.
It’s not as simple as Gran Colombia breaking up and never going back. The whole region was a mess of revolutions that merged and broke apart several times. Venezuela was on its 3rd republic before Gran Colombia even formed.
Many of the Mexican revolution options also aren’t part of modern Mexico either.