Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition - The Wealth of Electors (DLC propose)

[MUTYLATOR5553]

New fraction - Vikings (?)

And to this I will add other suggestions: Byzantine Empire & Turks - The Fall of Constantinople DLC Iberian Catholic Kingdoms & Emirate of Cordoba - The Reconquista DLC Tsardom of Bulgaria & Saint Stephen’s Crown - The Raiders from East DLC Kingdom of Portugal & Italians - The Ancestors of Progress DLC Morocco & Persian Empire - The Sandstorm DLC Ethiopia & Songhai - The Golden Kingdoms DLC Kingdom of Congo & Kingdom of Zimbabwe - The African Kingdoms DLC Japanese & Vietnamese - The Rising Emp…

[Vote] Dawn of the Dukes most anticipate civs

I liked the variety in these older DLCs - we got a little bit from every part of the world, everyone was satisfied. The first DLC focused on a specific region was Rise of the Rajas - from this point on, the DLC started to focus on specific regions / cultures. For this reason, Western European and Eastern European DLCs should not cause irritation or amazement. Rise of the Rajas focused on Southeast Asia, the Last Khan on the Turkic peoples (Bulgarians are the Turks who mixed with the Slavs and…

The future of AoE2:DE expansions

Calm down. This game needs a lot of many more civs. This game, instead of representing entire cultural groups as it used to be, now begins to make new civilizations that are represented by kingdoms, e.g. the Burgundians. Several civilizations are badly named, e.g. Teutons should be Germans (unless there are new German civs) and Slavs (who are Ruthenians and represent only them). As for the Name, these new civs are a matter of course, but there is now a fashion for non-Europeanness. India is n…

[DLC concept] The Wealth of India (Bengalis & Tamils)

In my opinion, this is a really solid proposition for the DLC. I would suggest such non-European DLCs (so as not to deviate from the topic in a sense): your Indian DLC proposition South American DLC - Chimú civ and Muisca civ Caucasus DLC - Georgians, Armenians and Khazars and two big DLCs similar to the good old DLCs: African DLC - Congolese, Kanem-Bornu, Songhai, Zimbabwe and Mamluks The Forgotten 2.0 - Tarascans, Siamese, Tibetans, Finns and Irish

Next DLC - consideration

I think the developers should release larger DLCs from time to time. DLC with 2 civs + 3 campaigns is not enough - I prefer to pay more, but get more for it. I think the creators could create 2-3 larger DLCs (4-5 civs): African, Forgotten Empires 2.0 and Balkans-Caucasus. Between these DLCs there could appear smaller LotW-like and DotD-like DLCs, e.g. Indian DLC (Bengalis, Dravidians + Punjabi), South American DLC (Chimu and Muisca), North American DLC (Mississippians and Tarascans), Icy DLC (…

What should be theme of the next expansion we're getting (if we're lucky enough to get one)?

DLC (Western European)Lords of the West + 2 civs: Burgundians, Sicilians DLC (African) + 2 civs: Swahilis, Kongolese DLC (American) + 4 civs: Mississippians, Haudenosaunee,Tupi, Caribs DLC (Eastern European) Boyars of the East + 4 civs: Wends, Serbocroats, Georgians, Armenians DLC (Asian) + 3 civs: Thais, Tibetans, Bengals

Realistic Expectations for the future DLCs

In my opinion Romanians civ could be civ added for free as part of the update. Making this civ part of the payload DLC would create bizarre complications, e.g. the ability to play them throughout the campaign, but not being able to play them in a skirmish or multiplayer. Adding this civ for free would make it easier to release 4 DLCs containing 2 new civs each. So the “40 civ” would be Romanians civ. Examples of the last 4 DLCs: Danube DLC - Serbo-Croatians civ and Habsburgs civ (civ which …

AOE II Dawn of the Dukes: Bohemians and Poles

2 African civs are definitely not enough. It should be a DLC with 4 new African civs.

It’s nice to lie and slander people like that?