Yes, without cheats I do not pass the first part and even with cheats it is very difficult and you have to be saving all the time…I hope they put it in cooperative, to see if I can pass it xd…
But as you do so that the Chinese do not bother to divide their country?..
I don’t understand your question.
If I was able to complete it without cheats, you’d probably be able too. You have to be VERY careful with the first shipment however.
Take away their Paladin and put in the Savaran, give it bonus vs cavary archers.
4 Likes
Take away Galleon from Venetians and give them Galleass as final upgrade to Galley line. With fast hand cannoneer type projectiles.
2 Likes
Would Savaran be their castle UU or replacement for paladins?
Replacement for Paladin. War Elephant remains. Else the traditionalists would be in uproar.
1 Like
Why not have Savaran locked behind the Imp UT to also be trained at castles? Like how Flaming camels can be trained at the castle along with Keshiks for Tatars.
1 Like
Of course, although with the Georgians and the Armenians it would already be fine…
That applies too to American civs prior to the conquest of America and sub-Saharan African civs…
Of course the Huns represent the Avars and Alans…
That’s true.
But this one is not. Camel’s job is killing cav which they can do even better than now with faster rof. I think a camel+xbow vs knight+xbow fight will be almost same. Although archer numbers snowball too fast. In the end it is a nerf for Indians (now Hindustanis) but not as much as you’re implying.
Hmm, they could adapt them into a caraphract/horse-archer unique unit. That would be pretty cool.
Its definitely not. Although camel’s job is killing cav it can’t do that if it dies sooner. When you take fights against a big bunch of crossbows your camels will die much sooner than opponent knights. The knight player only needs to lure your camels close to his flank crossbows. You’d lose numbers quite soon and then they’ll take the fight. Usually players mix knights-camels at times so that it becomes harder for their archer player to micro and then camel can deal good damage. But no one ever makes only camels in such fights except the current Indians who get an extra p.armor and can last longer in the battles. With that p.armor gone, it makes no sense to make them. So it is a huge nerf for Indians in TGs.
I hope Imperial camels have their stats changed to 0/1 armor by default. Then atleast in late imp Hindustanis might do good.
Except that Camel is faster than knight. So some knight will get hit before luring into trap.
True but you’re completely ignoring the faster firing bonus. 25% faster firing means knights will die 20% faster while camel will also die 20% faster to xbow due to 1 less PA. (30 shots → 24 shots). If xbow was a melee unit this would make them equal to generic. Now it is a small nerf in castle age but with their eco, it is still better than other camels, even Berbers imo.
That was proven to be OP and required change. If they get 1 PA again, it will be broken.
It is already better than current Indians.
1 Like
My point is you can only run away from the archer-knight army. You can’t take a favorable fight.
This type of heads on zero micro comparison aren’t meaningful simply because it will never happen that way. The knight player will take the fight only after enough of your front line camels are dead. You can’t win fights in castle age unless your flank heavily outnumbers opponent xbows. And if at all for some reason someone is hell bent on making camels as pocket, Gurjaras will be a much better option as they can mix their knight-line replacement uu.
That was because of the +1 from castle age carrying forward. Camels were harder to kill in castle age, Heavy camels had 5 p.armor too. That’s a lot stronger than just the imperial camels having 5 p.armor. You’d need to wait 4 mins after imp to get to that stage unlike before.
Orders of magnitude worse. No parthian tactics, no extra p.armor for light cav or camels in castle age. An extra range for hand canoneers isn’t worth weakening strong mobile units like CA in imp and cavalry in castle age. HC have very poor ROF and are inaccurate at range. This bonus will be good in some closed map fights or some specific matchups. In general Burgundian, Spanish bonuses for HC are much better than this one. Caravanserai seems like a TG Black forest building
I’m not saying there will be zero micro.
We were talking about TG army for Hindustanis. And of course they won’t make anything other than Camels. CA, HC or hussar are irrelevant here. Maybe the pnly other unit you want to add is siege which gets a big buff. Now they have SE and BBC with +1/+1 armor.
In TG, their castle age is nerfed but well compensated by Imperial age buffs.
Love this idea, Savaran would be a Paladin with different stats and properties, and most importantly, a refreshing eastern look
Same as Hussars and Winged Hussars branches
2 Likes
Yes, maybe in August like last year, since in October they would launch AoM DE so no and in December some solitary civ for the AoE 3 DE …