It kind of does, you’re right. But it can be a standalone architecture. Eastern European uses more wood, whereas this Armenian/Caucasian one is mostly stone.
2 Likes
Is there a name for tthese soldiers?
I think Khevsur could be a nice choice for a UU than Monaspa cavalry, Monaspa can be a UT for a cav buff or something close.
1 Like
2 Likes
Did they appeared already in game?
I don’t think they did, closest thing that they look like are the legionaries but in the 5th Tamerlane scenario they’re represented by Byzantines with cataphracts.
How to distinguish Azerbaijanis from Turks and Turkmens?
I second this. Instead of bloomin romans give the people what they really want
ARMENIA, GEORGIA, ITALY SPLIT INTO PAPAL STATES, GENOA AND VENICE, TIBET, NEPAL AND BHUTAN
MAYBE ALSO SOME AFRICAN CIV
1 Like
Can someone make a civi concept for these? Id love to see.
Someone had made a decent one a while back but i cant be arsed looking it up
Things I sorta remember that really fit though
NEPALI - Farms 2x2, Farms faster on hilly terrain
TIBETIAN - UU yak rider heavy cavalry
BHUTAN - Monastary availabe in the feudal age. UU monk that can fight
That’s because no one ever made any.
Da fak?
Google it my guy
https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe2/comments/nqkh8w/my_civ_concept_series_15_the_nepalese/
https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe2/comments/8e8kw5/new_civ_concepts_nepalese/
#################################################################################################
Idk why its censoring one link. This forum is crazy with the censoring
https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe2/comments/8e8kw5/new_civ_concepts_nepalese/
First concept UU is rajput and second one Yak rider 11
For a supposed civ concept I dont see any actual effort by the OP to post an actual tech tree or in this case 2. Get it up somewhere soon would ya?
It’s weird how this thread got necro’d after a year
The user necroing this thread has done the same in a bunch of other topics
1 Like