their tier lists that are now out of date? as for his video, he doesn’t actually test it. its initial thoughts only.
2 Likes
this is ironic coming from the guy who thinks a civ should be able to produce a 17 attack, 5/6 armor, 140 health, 1.67 speed unit with 1 range out of a stable in 9 seconds.
1 Like
I trust his “Initial thoughts” far far more than @MatCauthon3, @JoJo9942 or anyone on this forum. Sorry.
civ should be able to produce a 17 attack, 5/6 armor, 140 health, 1.67 speed unit with 1 range out of a stable in 9 seconds.
No, I increased the price, I am going to increase gold price even further
well suit yourself, but I wouldn’t take Hera’s word as gospel considering he barely plays out of meta, but of course I don’t think you needed Hera’s opinion. You’re so convinced yourself that its so bad without playing with them, tells a lot about you…
6 Likes
What??? If hera said the unit is now balanced, I would not have made this thread OR complained. This is an insane accusation you use to try to invalidate me.
This whole thread is about seeing the PROs analysis of the “buffed” EA and responding.
by 5 gold. that doesn’t mean crap, still 2/3 the gold cost of a paladin. it still comes out in 9 seconds, faster then your opponent could muster halbs or camels. and frankly it can outrun both of those.
3 Likes
he hasn’t even tested it yet.
2 Likes
exactly, you needed a pro’s validation who btw just reacted on reading a sentence in a patch note to tell you its bad instead of you judging for yourself
4 Likes
i bet EAs + arbs or hcs + Skirms could deal a lot of dmg.
2 Likes
I have judged it for myself as well, but I won’t broadcast it as I would broadcast the 2nd best player in the world’s analysis of the EA “buff”
Except it wasn’t an “analysis”, it was just a 10 second reaction in a 15 min video
3 Likes
it is a buff, whether you like it or not. it’s a 25% increase in dps, and costs less. the fact is though, that despite not using the EA before, the Indians were a balanced civ.
what happens when you take a balanced civ and buff something they didn’t use before into usefulness? you imbalance them.
i’ll ask you again Parthnan. show me an Elephant UU that sees regular play at the pro level.
2 Likes
And what does “that” tell about me? I haven’t even written anything of my own opinion here, it is all the opinion of Hera, the 2nd Best Player in this World.
Go tell him what his opinion on EA tells about him.
and yet why would you post it if you didn’t agree with it?
1 Like
Because I want to see everyone in discussion about this unit which Hera and Viper say is crap and Hera says it is still useless crap
Hera says without actually testing. and no. clearly you wanted something to change. you want proof?
hera didn’t say this. this is pure you.
hera didn’t say this. and it does have a role, it makes a great tank for archers behind it. someone even pointed that out on Heras video.
and you follow it up with this.
clearly you want more change.
2 Likes
Hera did CLEARLY imply it. Watch it again,. his reaction to this buff.
It s not me who is saying that.
clearly you want more change.
What? I just want some fruitful discussion on the current state of the EAs, not blamegames that you usually devolve these kind of threads into.
btw, your video has no proof that its still crap. it has an opinion, but no testing has been done to prove its crap.
as for a role? i’ll give you a role for it.
put it in front of arbs or hand cannons. backed up with BBC.
2 Likes