Hera and Viper were wrong about Goths. Goths were consistently strong for 2 months now, and were at the top of the winrate when they were at their weakest.
On that I agree, I mean, they are a better now, there is no denying that, but they still lack a specific role, I think Indians still have better options than EA.
Still it’s better than nothing, and a lot of civs that we discussed that needed some change weren’t even considered.
These are your words. Pretty vile ones. You wanted a buff for them and they delivered two of them, if you are not satisfied with it, not their fault. At most I’ll give them anti archer and hence anti skirm bonus if the current changes are truly not good enough
i think JoJo sums it up for me.
Hera actually says it might be a little bit more viable. that would be better then F tier. he also claims it doesn’t deal a lot of dmg.
the unit literally has the dps of a cav archer.
so by your logic, hera is saying almost every archer in the game is low dps.
bet most people would disagree with him.
hera didn’t test it.
hera didn’t say it was F tier still.
hera did say it was at least a little viable.
hera also said it was low dps. the unit has the same dps as a cav archer.
so is almost every archer in the game now a low dps unit? according to you, that would be yes.
I’d still say its a nerf to the big power spike Mayans get at early imp
I don’t think they ever used it either way, they had their better eagles to deal with that
I don’t think repeating this is going to make it more relevant and I don’t need to tell him because I can judge it for myself. I just want you to not pretend like its not your negative opinion reflected on this thread, its Hera’s.
I wanted it to be usably good for all its cost like the Ballista Elephant which it wasn’t pre buff and they delivered.