Yep and that’s literally why this “misunderstanding” angle doesn’t hold any water.
Split, causes one thing to become multiple things.
Rename causes something, previously referred by some name or designation, now to be referred to by another.
Indians and Chinese were both split.
Only indians renamed.
Three months ago everybody knew the difference between re-naming and being split. but now that corporate daddy needs it’s white knights to save it from the meaning of words, now split suddenly means re-name so now the defenders can act confused why we’re trying to intentionally misunderstand what cysion said.
these are kindergarten level words, intentionally being revisionistically redefined to aid the deceit of mega-corporation.
The exact same thing happened with V&V when suddenly people figured out how to conjure up a new bespoke industry incongruous definition of “campaign” so MS didn’t deceive us.
We had one indian civ, we now have 4.
We had one chinese civ, we now have 4.
What the old and new names were, weren’t, are, aren’t, could have been, should have been, may yet someday be, is all entirely irrevelant.
“we are not splitting chinese”
There are now 4 chinese, because it was split.