Probably way too optimisitic thought on a DLC hint

[Quasibrodo]

@FloosWorld

Wow, that’s actually the first time being called a troll and I’m honestly not sure whether I should feel honored or insulted by that. O.o

@Quasibrodo

It seems you knew, before any concrete information was presented in regards to what would exactly would happen to chinese or the civs that would be introduced, that chinese wouldn’t be split, and even after the logical contradiction of that was presented to you, you doubled down. To say this more explicitly, all we knew at the time you claim to have known this wasn’t a split, was Cysion saying it wasn’t a split.

@Quasibrodo

Therefore I can only conclude your definition of what a split is, is whatever Cysion says a split is.

@FloosWorld

Nah, I don’t get extra info far in advance.

@FloosWorld

I leave playing word games to others.

Sure you aren’t. Somehow someway you read all of this, me explaining at the time that we had no information, and you claimed and doubled down to have had believed this wasn’t a split, I explicitly draw attention that we atually had no information to go off of, I concluded that you just agree with whatever Cysion says, and somehow…somehow, twist this around to me saying I thought you gotten some info ahead of the reveal.

Also my original post.

@Quasibrodo

Three months ago everybody knew the difference between re-naming and being split. but now that corporate daddy needs it’s white knights to save it from the meaning of words, now split suddenly means re-name so now the defenders can act confused why we’re trying to intentionally misunderstand what cysion said.

these are kindergarten level words, intentionally being revisionistically redefined to aid the deceit of mega-corporation.

The exact same thing happened with V&V when suddenly people figured out how to conjure up a new bespoke industry incongruous definition of “campaign” so MS didn’t deceive us.

you NOW claim to have just gotten your dates wrong. Please, what about this would make you think the point was “1 month after V&V2 was released everybody agreed what a split was, but 2 months after V&V2 released NOOOOOOOW, there’s some confusion”?

Everybody was good with split until some arbitrary time after V&V2 was announced? What? Even if you truly didn’t know when V&V2 was announced that is the most bizarre thing to believe this was trying to say. What even is the point in that statement interpreted as such? That gave you zero pause to re-evaluate your understanding of the statement in question.

Again you have to present this as you mis-understood what was being talked about.

Defending V&V2 is the communications equivalent of man having a cold. Not with a 1000 years of communications training can you begin appreciate the difficulty of understanding and communicating. there’s mis-speaking, while mis-speaking, while mis-understanding, while mis-communicating, while speaking to Miss Speaking and Miss Understanding, while making a mistake about what you mis-spoke about, while you realizing you mis-spoke about something else, while your bike is missing spokes, and all this takes so much time you miss steak dinner.