In fact I think AOE3 do not need new civs dlc. AOE3 lacks scenario and campaign. You can just use ready-made art recource to make such a pure campaign dlc. I think it will far more easier and more famous for fans.
Personnellement, je prĂ©fĂšre de nouvelles civs que simplement des campagnes (que jây touche jamais)
mais là il y aura de toute façon plus de nouveau contenus pour aoe3 DE vu que le jeu est maintenant en maintenance active
I doubt weâll be getting any DLCs after the cancellation of the last one.
They couldâve released the Denmark - Poland DLC easily but nooooo, we ainât getting anything at this point.
How about a bug fix patch? Iâd like that a lot.
They already have assets to make almost every major campaign from 1500-1860.
They donât really need to make a full skirmish âDanishâ âAustrianâ or âPolishâ civ, but they could simply make campaign-specific civs with a limited deck like Morocco. They have all the models.
I agree with that, though Iâd still really like Poland if they pick support back up. They could totally go for Campaigns + 1 civ to keep everyone happy.
Bros here think voice acting comes for free.
Bro here thinks he is the only pragmatic one.
I mean yeah. Mostly because Iâm not the one whoâs constantly trying to take business decisions for the billion-dollar company like I know what Iâm doing.
I mean, I would do it for free.
It would be awful, but it would be free.
Iâd say whatâs stopping you but of course this clown game still has the scenario editor brokenâŠ
Whatâs hilarious is that AoE3 isnât even the worst off for this. AoE4 doesnât even have an editor.
That game is just a pile of badly optimized spaghetti code in a wish .com AOE2 wrapper
I think those campaign-specific civs could also be revs in skirmish,such as Tatar and Morocco,etc.
Please fix the Akan native site unlock for Belanda Hitam.
22 civs are really enough. The most famous civs have done, such as China\Japan\USA. Although I love more other civs, but I know they wonât sell well. However, many players are eager for some important scenarios, just like Ming VS Later JinïŒQing)\ Ming VS Japan\Opium War\Napoleonic Wars\American Revolutionary War etc.
WE is going to make all of them VARIANT CIVILIZATIONS
No, the map of the Asian region during the Age of Empires III clearly lacks the regional power of the Persian Empire, as well as maps of the Persian region and southern China. Similarly, the highlands of southern Africa also lack maps and countries
The number of civilizations in Asia and Africa should be increased to four respectively to ensure the integrity of the region. The lack of Safavid Persia is a clear failure
I love to see the civs you metioned, but I know they wonât sell well. I know most players just play the campaigns and then uninstall the game. They only care about campaigns. So I think a pure campaign dlc may be far more easy to sell better.
No, Persia, as the most important region and country in West Asia for a long time, has sufficient historical significance and can serve as a starting point for the Second Battle of the Age of Empire II, introducing the Battle of Ismail into it. It can even be used as a bonus country for the so-called âhistorical campaignâ package, which provides additional rewards for players who purchase the campaign package. It is still an important country and can be used as a sales incentive