Irónicamente no intentaba hacer alusión a nada, solo quería una unidad para Chile que pudiera ocupar el lugar de las unidades de tipo comanchero.
Recuerdo haber leído en el foro que chile tenia carretas de guerra y por eso lo pregunte, los zuavos solo lo mencione porque el texto que paso pwaopwao los menciona.
Tampoco tenia conocimiento de los cañones constitucionalistas.
Podrías pasar una imagen, si tenemos suerte los desarrolladores leerán esta conversación y quizás chile pueda tener alguna unidad de artillería de nivel imperial.
Pregunta, ¿me perdí de algo?, ¿hay algún motivo por el cual la gente solo pueda hacer referencia a WOL, pero no puedan mencionarlo?
No hay ninguna razón, por algún motivo la gente simplemente lo hace aún siendo que no me entran en la cabeza. Hay incluso personas que me han enviado mensajes privados de sus “diseños” de civs que son como copias de civs de WoL con cosas ligeramente cambiadas y yo estoy sentado acá con cara de ???
¿Quizás a muchas personas les paso lo mismo que a mí?. Se enteraron de algo por medio de otra persona que quizás estaba haciendo referencia directa o indirecta a WOL.
En pocas palabras, quizás no están haciendo referencia a WOL, solo a conocimiento que se popularizo gracias a el.
Ok, eso ya es bastante raro. XD
Solo se me ocurren dos posibilidades, se dio la casualidad y tuvieron la misma idea o solo son fans de WOL que quieren esa civilización concreta pero con su propio “toque personal”. (te recomiendo no tomarlo a mal, seguro no lo hacen con mala intención)
No soy un experto en cañones, pero a simple vista me parece un mortero. Quizás chile podría tener alguna tarjeta que reduzca el coste en monedas de los morteros un 50%. (Igual que los Rusos)
Por la epoca, el material y la forma, me parece que puede ser un Howitzer.
Si lo quisieran incluir lo pueden hacer con los cañones napoleon (al dia de hoy me sigue sorprendiendo que los napoleon sean la version mercenaria de los cañoncitos suecos y no los monstruos de bronce de 12 libras que eran en realidad)
Casi completamente seguro que el cañón napoleón se refiere al Cañón Napoleón Modelo 1857 12-Libras, el cañón de anima lisa mas usado de la guerra civil norteamericana. Si hay otro no lo conozco.
I remember someone asked at some point why Argentina has Imperial Mortars, I think the developers were based on the Monasterio Mortars.
I clarify that I heard this elsewhere in the forum and I put this information only for information.
Having said the above, the question arises as to why only the Monasterio mortars were added, clearly Argentina should be able to access more imperial artillery units or at least be able to create them cheaply and quickly.
I would love for the developers to change the Argentine revolution from Germany to France.
According to this graph, they are the third migratory flow between 1857-1940 and in my opinion it makes more sense than Germany, which does not take advantage of the Argentine revolution.
Furthermore, I would like the Germans to have Chile as a replacement for the Argentine revolution, which could receive a death hussar for each shipment and take better advantage of the civilization bonus.
In short, this change makes much more sense, it does not break anything and at the same time it favors the two civilizations and the two revolutions.
Only if we add those three countries and use the strange rules of the German umbrella civilization, but in my opinion that would be dishonest, also as I said the Germans would benefit more from the Chilean revolution and the French would benefit more from the Argentine revolution.
Also, I’m asking for it because it would make using these civilizations and revolutions more fun.
Germany wins a revolution that is really useful, that does not need too many cards and that can also take very good advantage of its civilization bonus.
France on the other hand wins a revolution that complements her special characteristics, melee cavalry, grenadiers and artillery.
The same thing, at that time, the German nation was just being created, so just adding Germany and Austria gives you more immigrant population than France… although I understand that you are referring to the fact that both France and Argentina are cavalry civs…
Regardless of the historical situation at that time, I stand by what I said, it seems dishonest/cheating to me to use a combination of civilizations to justify that the Argentine revolution is from Germany.
I genuinely believe that an Argentine revolution with France would be a lot of fun to play and ironically would be more historically correct than the Italian and Spanish variants. (although that’s what matters the least to me ).
Plus the Germans really need a revolution they can use and I think Chile is their best option.
Chile could guarantee the boom of mills, a conversion of uhlans to hussars of death and Chile could also receive its hussars of death with each shipment, so it complements very well with this civilization and its special characteristic.
One argument to back this is that the argentine state copy many things from France in the second half of the 1800’s, from administration, certains customs to architecture. Personally, i don’t think that Argentina as a revolution for France would be better that the italian version.
Nobody surpasses the Tanos, the Italian version of the Argentine revolution is probably the one that represents a large number of Argentines and at the same time it is the one that offers, in my opinion, the most powerful version of the horse grenadier and the gaucho, the flagship units. (in a nutshell I agree with you on that)
Now, good, a hypothetical Argentine revolution with France implies several coincidences that would greatly benefit the revolution.
For example, the Criollos and French Royal Army card, the Gribeauval System, Engineering School, Advanced Arsenal, Flying Battery and the two factories cards, the Thoroughbreds and Blandengues cards, etc.
Likewise, even if you are not interested in the fact that France allows the Argentine revolution to be used, I advocate changing it for Chile.
Chile can only be used with Spain, which is unfair seeing the rest of the South American revolutions, plus the Germans would benefit a lot from having the hussars of death and the revolutionaries on their side. (In addition to the obvious fact that Chile is the only revolution that would really take advantage of the characteristics of German civilization.)
I want to make it clear that I am not trying to force this change, I am only asking for what I believe would give the Chilean and German players a fun option that complements each other well.
PS: I respect Commander Brown and his exploits, but Bouchard has some adventures that make him a more fun option.
Card Name: Bouchard the Adventurer (Inf)
Effect: allows you to copy the effect of an enemy or friendly card until the end of the game; Sending the card again allows you to change the active effect.
Effect 2: The first time you send this card you will obtain the Santa Rosa corvette, a heroic ship that can be rebuilt from any dock or maritime shipping point.
I was referencing Hipólito Bouchard’s fleet since it has a pretty interesting history. Hippolyte Bouchard - Wikipedia(15,Argentina%2C%20Chile%2C%20and%20Peru.
).