Okay, I get it.
When you gather food and gold, you can choose according to the situation, you now need to build an army or age up. If you gather wood to build a large army of useless soldiers, you guaranteed will age up later than your opponent. And you get this disadvantage because of units that lose limit on limit fight. We are not in the treaty. The fact that they are more expensive does not mean that they are worse. I saw a guy in Mexico shoot down voltigeurs with soldados with a perfect trade. There the losses were 1 soldado for 5 voltigeurs. Here the situation will be similar. To win a xbow vs skirm fight, you need not 33% more crossbowmen, but much more. You’ll just lose every battle and you will lose control over the map.
No steel bolts can compensate for less armor and HP.
Less DPS due to poor animation and less range and less modifiers. For some reason that guy from your video used cassadors and not crossbowmen. I don’t see
And
For some reason he doesn’t think so, despite the endless chests with 1200 wood.
It worked for me for Russia. Why can’t Malta do the same?
I never said that age 2 rush is bad. I said after age 2 you forget that you have crossbowmen. You send the card to the cassadors 100% of the time.
He doesn’t get wood. His army doesn’t need it. He will never age 3 later than you, unless he’s taken so much damage that he can surrender immediatly.
Some skills for you and the lack of skills in the enemy. He will not be able to run back and shoot using the advantage of the range of 2 points, as well as all the upgrades of the improved arsenal))) Drums for example)
Spain has an unction.
And the Italian crossbowmen, in addition to steel bolts and cards, have 35% armor and HP like a voltigeur. He is better than the Maltese crossbowman in all respects, but why do you say that he sucks?
Look at your decks from 10 years ago and judge your skills through them.
Playing rush is too risky. If you haven’t killed your opponent at age 2, and half your deck is supplying pikemen and crossbowmen, you lost.
I didn’t say that YOU don’t know how to play. I said that you don’t understand how to play for Malta. And you proved it to me now. You say that you can only play for Malta the same way as for Haudannosi. And you say that because both Malta and Italy are unfinished pieces of shit. That’s right. I’m not arguing with you. I’m trying to show you that your words don’t contradict mine in any way.
Prove what?