Nope, MP has no 1492 content, at all.
Almost all Euro civs begin in the 30 Years War which began in 1618, so really not even 1500 after the Discovery Age.
Even Tenoctitlan fell in 1521.
aight whatever u tell yourself im done dealing with u do not reply or post to my thread anymore
You have no power or right to enforce this.
1 Like
I love korea but they were weak in AOE III era .
Priority for new asian civs :
PersiaăSiamăKorea
You forgot the Omani Sultanate, which was huge in the timeframe, one of the most stretched out empires in History, and the last Arabian expansionistic state and Colonial Power.
They are way more important than Korea for the time period, and an actual competitor against the Portuguese, the Dutch and the British.
They colonized vast swathes of land in Africa, vied for control of the Spice Trade in the Indian Ocean, and destroyed the last Trade Empire in Africa, Zanzibar, which they promptly colonized.
1 Like
Oh yes thats true I forgot them sorry
1 Like
Bro I have a question. Its weird that city of Bandar Abbas (port of Abbas) is under the Omani control in the picture above . Why ?
1 Like
" Omani period[edit]
Between 1794 and 1868, Bandar Abbas was under the control of the Sultanate of Oman and Zanzibar through a lease agreement with Persia. The details of the original lease apparently differed between the Arabic and Persian versions. The Omanis controlled the coastal stretch of some 100 miles from Sadij to Khamir, and inland about 30 miles, as far as Shamil. They also controlled the islands of Hormuz and Qeshm. In 1823, the Persians attempted to oust the Omanis, but the sultan managed to keep his hold on Bandar through bribery and tribute of the governor of Shiraz. In 1845â46, an army under the governor general of Fars menaced Bandar to extort tribute, while another army under the governor of Kerman besieged Minab. The Omanis threatened to blockade Persia, but the British resident at Bushir convinced them to back down.[8]
The Persians recovered the city in 1854, while the sultan was in Zanzibar. Under British pressure following the Anglo-Persian War in 1856, Persia renewed Omanâs lease on favourable terms. It was clarified that the leased territory belonged to the province of Fars and that the Persian flag would fly over Bandar Abbas. The rental rate was also increased. Under British pressure the agreement was renewed in 1868, but at a higher rate of rent and for a shorter duration. Two months after its renewal, the lease was cancelled by the Persian government, citing a clause which permitted its termination if the sultan of Oman were overthrown.[8]"
Basically, the omani had it under a lease agreement.
It was under their dominions until 1854, when the Persians took it back.
1 Like
Thanks for the quick reply. You think is it possible to add Afghanistan in AOE III DE as new asian civ ?
I do not think so, though they would make a good Minor Tribe. Afghanis did not do much in the AoE3 timeframe, except resist the British. All they really had going for them, are the famous Jezzails.
Pashtuns with a Jezzail Gunner Super Skirmisher, with very low HP and Rate of Fire, but very high Damage and Range.
It would pair well with a DLC that brings up Persia.
1 Like
It is that important to fight about exactly how important what civilisation was during which time period?
Korea is popular and has to potential to add some interesting, cool and unique units and mechanics to the game so it could very well be added. Japanese, Lakota, Aztecs, Inca all were only important in one region for a small time in the AoE3 time frame. It it really important to argue about how important each civilisations exactly was?
Oman, Moroccan and Persia are definitely better choices because they are interesting, different and the first two perfectly fit into an African Expansion. All of them also went to war with multiple civilisations that are already in the game.
They could also share mechanics together as they have cultural similarities despite all 3 being part of the 3 major schools of Islam. (Ibadi, Sunni and Shia)
1 Like
If Omani Sultanate want to compete for a seat in the Middle East, you must compete with Persia,If there is only one seat
What?
That is like saying Portugal has to compete with Spain for a slot in the game.
You can have both, as they were quite different, and both were important for the period.
2 Likes
When the Incas joined, I found a coincidence. There are two countries in North America and two in South America. If there are two countries in every continent after that.
Northern Europe: Sweden will be paired with Denmark.
(Finland was conquered, Norway and Denmark allied)
Africa: Algeria and Ethiopian, historical battles have been produced and should be fully utilized.
East Asia: China will be paired with Japan.
Southeast Asia: There is a new country that will match India.
Middle East: There is a new country that will match Ottoman.
In this way, the developer will Circle the world and end the mission
AoE4 is being developed by a different studio, the Forgotten Empires team âfinishingâ AoE3DE wonât impact its development, if anything it just means theyâll either make AoMDE faster or start work on a new game of their own faster.
1 Like
Okay, I confuse the publisher with the developer.
allied is the wrong term, it was for all intend and purpose 1 nation: denmark-norway or the twin kingdom
itâs is a similar situation to Scotland and England today, technically 2 different countries but for anyone outside it is the same country, and with only 1 true capital (in D-N case it litterally only was 1 capital, christania/oslo wasnât set up as a capital).
Similar to PolishâLithuanian union (1385 - 1795. From 1569, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth).
errr Goyro was basically a vassal state for Yaun dynasty.
and why is Lakota in the game?