They have to—otherwise, why even mention it in the description? I wonder if we’ll get Galvarino both with hands and then without them.
3 Likes
A campaign focusing on Inés Suárez would be cool. She was active as a swordfighter on certain occasions, and encouraged and nursed her comrades, so her unit could be like a Warrior Priest, being able to both attack and heal. The conquistadora accompanied Pedro de Valdivia and became his mistress. Her campaign could be a precursor to the Lautaro one, with a unique perspective on the conflict.
2 Likes
I’ve never gotten the hype around Tlaxcalans, it’s just aztecs with spanish tech, just like… play those civs lol.
2 Likes
Simply not buying.
Won’t be buying anything until 3 Kingdoms is removed from multiplayer.
4 Likes
Its kinda like Spartans/Athenians split I guess
I can see that happen if they split Spanish, leaving them to be the early modern civ they already represent and making El Cid a different campaign.
1 Like
- More heroes for ranked
- Warcraft abilities for heroes and fantasy elements in campaigns
- No new voicelines
- Recycled campaign slides
7 Likes
Some historical inaccuracy, unit or architectural mismatch from History fans perspective. And from ranked players’ perspective, creating a very weak civ with no cavalry, other missing techs and units and no proper compensation for it like Dravidians or over compensating for it like OG Cumans, Gurjaras.
4 Likes
Civ design and campaigms
So pretty much everything outside of theme
4 Likes
Hey, we already got campaigns about Attila and Tamerlane, the Conquistadors aren’t as horrible in comparison 
Though personally I’d indeed prefer a campaign based on a “likeable” Conquistador like Cortez rather than on a murder hobo like Pizarro.
1 Like
Cortez was awful
Like, you can find worse than him, but he was a greedy, backstabbing, brutal person
4 Likes
The main reason i’d probably favor Pizarro (or Hernando de Soto if we get a Mississippians civ) is that we haven’t seen the fall of the Incas from either angle, whereas the fall of the Aztec Empire we’ve already seen from the Aztec perspective.
3 Likes
Cortes fought a battle against the Aztecs, at least, although it wasn’t the Aztec army at its peak. Pizarro massacred unarmed and unsuspecting civilians, precisely because it was the only way for him to win.
1 Like
Without the help of Tlaxcalans, he wouldn’t have been able to win.
Yeah but my argument is that it would be difficult to create a campaign whose climax is you using bombards against villagers, it just wouldn’t be as exciting as a real battle.
1 Like
Montezuma is already semifictional, A Tlaxcala campaign could go the same route
Bro the first thing Cortez did once he made landfall on the continent is to kill everybody in the closest village he could find what are you even talking about.
2 Likes
Then don’t buy it ever
3 Likes
Welp, we’re not taught in detail about the Spanish conquest of Americas in Polish schools, so I guess I only know Cortez from sources that propagandize him. Still, in comparison to Pizarro he’s at least a bit ambiguous.
I’m still waiting for a rework of Incan voiceovers (bad quality).
3 Likes