I had to make a fusion then, make it elaborate or win the question why it wont take as much time as in castle age that people stay in feudal age in team games?
Feudal is played on literally every open map, especially when you’re Flank.
6 Likes
So, its used for 2v2 purposes where as 4v4 4 members gets rushed 4 members go to castle age, again only 4 members tend to play the whole game and win the game single handedly where as the 4 players who are using the flanks end up at low scores either 4000 or nearly 7000 If they can play as much feudal as much they play in imperial or castle age.
Even pockets play Feudal on open maps as they work together with their Flank. It all boils down to strat
2 Likes
Until which time could you give me an example, will they atleast play till 25 mins in game?
Im convinced this is trolling
1 Like
convincing is doing no better until it is done on both sides.
1 Like
You should be in Imperial by 25 minutes game
1 Like
Now this is why no one play feudal age.
1 Like
This is like arguing with an AI. Closed maps and water maps are always fast castle. You can even fast castle on Arabia if you wall (or team wall in team games) and house wall behind. But it’s not the standard play. You don’t even need to fully wall if you defensively tower between your gold and wood.
2 Likes
(post deleted by author)
Sure. But the same could be said about Dark Age. And even Castle, to a certain extent
Dont you want to play dark age? where single TC is needed?
There are generations of maps like Black Forest where proper walls simply are not a thing for the flanks, and brutal Feudal fights may ensue. Playing flank on team Black Forest is true gameplay, not to diminish the work of the pocket players.
But still they wall, BF is all about wall. And whoever clicks Imp at 25 mins wins the game.
Castle and Imperial have UU. They are the cooler ages
1 Like
A: While they will wall just as players do on other maps, it will not be a chokepoint style wall. It will cost more for far less protection and is vulnerable to Feudal aggression. Players who cannot handle such heat get gobsmacked. There are also games where flanks go Feudal after winning the villager fight. Heck there are games where the villager wars really are the central attraction with unbelievable attrition.
B: Not on 4v4 team BF. Furthermore, some players have made it into the Imperial Age in far less than that due to luck with the Boars, but had the game even out. In 1v1 Black Forest there are a variety of effective approaches, but that is not for everyone.
PS: Fast Imperial Ages are normal strategies for civilizations like the Turks. Twenty-five minutes is not a particularly good timing.
Do you think this person who has asked for more realistic gold mining is asking a good Faith question
2 Likes
maybe he is a grandpa and just want someone to talk to, lots of time on his hand
1 Like
I do accept the attraction, degrading whole score from feudal age of the opponent, but for such a small fun time is that necessary we need to be pushing all our resources uselessly in feudal age when else all players who are not playing the flanks use great advantages in castle age and Imperial age? I accepted feudal age plays important role in 1v1 and 2v2, but still 3v3 and 4v4 feudal age is a backlog, we need to make the castle age directly after dark age.
Or make a feudal mix castle age directly like the burgundians do castle and Imperial age mix. And even burgundians should make cavaliers in feudal mix castle age.