Please lets represent The treaty Community

[OperaticShip743]

I don’t know what you think of this proposal. If expanding the number of cards seemed crazy.

Nearly outdated stuff that could be useful. (Potential improvements)

I think there are too many important cards in the age of commerce (II). Cards that improve coin collecting in plantations and some from mills (farm, rice field, etc) could move at age 3 or 4. In treaty you sometimes have to leave important cards out of the deck by the slot limit. Also the card that extends the limit of detachments or towers of all kinds could move, or the card that makes military units build buildings. And other cards that are not essentially necessary for the age of commerce. I…

The castles of Hausa and Ethiopia need to enable upgrades just like other defensive buildings.

I also think late-game defensive buildings are very weak. I propose that defensive buildings like castles and towers have a further improvement in the imperial age.

Nearly outdated stuff that could be useful. (Potential improvements)

Why doesn’t this card give the artillery some kind of permanent upgrade? Maybe you make artillery cheaper. The castles of Hausa and Ethiopia need to enable upgrades just like other defensive buildings. I also think late-game defensive buildings are very weak. I propose that defensive buildings like castles and towers have a further improvement in the imperial age.