how many people new to the forum showed up with his posting characteristics and showed up the day after he got banned?
It seems you are confused with someone else.
1 Like
nah, iām not the only one who thinks youāre equalizer.
1 Like
So?! What am I suppose to do with that?
1 Like
If you have an issue with a player, just go to a moderator and talk about it. If both are the same person, the moderators will take care. No need to discuss this in a thread like this.
2 Likes
Itās a difficult pole actually. I initially thought āyesā, but later I decided and voted for ānoā for some reasons: if thereāre cases that I need to represent some Slavic civs in my custom campaign such as Bosnians, then theyād be represented as āRusā, which is quite awkward. So, I thought itās inevitable that the āSlavsā should go on anyway.
In fact, the devs are responsible for this. In the past, civs were named based on āpeoplesā, but since recent DLCs, they make civs based on ācountryā. This is not fair. It shouldnāt have been so. Rather, there are still unique worldwide peoples that can be represented in game enough such as Jurchens, Tibetans, Georgians, Armenians. Current devsā attitude made them end up not being in gameā¦
2 Likes
exactly my thoughtsā¦
Rename the Vikings the Norse. That would cover all the Scandinavians. Russians is sufficiently broad I think to cover every cultural group not covered by the Lithuanians, Bulgarians, Magyars, Huns, Cumans, Bohemians and Teutons in that area.
1 Like
Ok, rename them. What could be the problem with that?
The problem with renames, is that it open up holes on the map, so unless you want another 18 European civs, you will not want renames.
2 Likes
Again, what is the real problem with it? While the civs being balance imo add 50 moreā¦ Most people will use Franks anyway 11
There are not enough civ slots. there are only 9 left, and they should not go to Europe.
The engine is limited, it has a hard cap.
1 Like
You donāt speak for the rest of the playerbase.
1 Like
I speak the truth.
We have enough European civs. 18 out of 39 is enough.
2 Likes
I am not a fan for keep adding civs, and I think the game have more than enough, I even suggest to remove some stupid civs but I have a question; you said the game only can have 9 civs more because it is the cap, but canāt the devs add more servers or engines or whatever and add more? Again I am against adding any civ but I am just curious about the cap thing here so the devs canāt add more engines or servers or what for example?
the game engine is what the game runs on, you canāt just add more engines.
2 Likes
Then these are good news! So at last and at max only +9 civs are availabe to add! So happy to know they canāt add civs for ever. Although I think we have enough and donāt need more.
I am a fan of adding civs until the engine no longer can have anymore.
I just want more civs from other places.
3 Likes
Ah yeah in this I agree with you. They recently added 5 Euro civs and 2 on the way so 7 Euro civs in 16 months (I donāt know if you include Cumans/Bulgars Euro but imo you can assume them Euro too here).
16 months? DE came out in november. the second DLC comes out in august. thats 9 months. so 21 months. 16 months would have been MARCH.