“then it can’t be separate otherwise the devs should have just said Germans representing only Kingdom of Germany.”
You said this, how does the same thing not apply to Croatia???
Croatia was part of Byzantines for a very short period
And in the glory days of Byzantine, (800s +) Croatia was separate
you have to troll, I meant Franconia and Hungary
What???
How is this got anything to do with Franconia???
Hungary 1102 you know what year I was thinking
Then I must be an alien… Spoken Polish is like a washing machine, written is better, but hardly I would say I understand 50%. Maybe 30…
there will never be a civ called
“Kingdom of Hungary in Personal Union with Kingdom of Croatia and Dalmatia”
And it can’t be “Hungarians” and represent Croatia too.
The fact is, BOTH are separate KINGDOMS with DIFFERENT histories, cultures armies whatever!
They never became one State, they were just a union of two states
and Serbia was part of Byzantium 
you obviously don’t know what you’re talking about
such a personal union was essentially Hungary, where Hungarian was the official language, Croatia in every sense subordinated to the decisions of the Hungarian court without any independence in foreign policy
I would like you to list the years when Serbia was under Byzantine rule
Serbia was ruled by Serbian rulers all the time while Croatia was subordinated to the Hungarian crown, in the context of the Middle Ages this means that it had no independence.
1 Like
That’s why I wrote spoken slowly. If you spoke will Pole about some common subject (not economics or something) and he was talking slowly you would understand much more than 30 percent. Of course if you watch some tv show where they talk normal speed its harder no doubt.
Plus there is that problem with words being same but having different meaning. Like famous szukać which means “searching” in Polish and “fuc king” in Czech 
4 Likes
Byzantine annexed some parts of Serbian principality between 1025 and 1090. So not the whole state, just some parts.
1 Like
HAHA I know that
2 Likes
Portugal:
- First Africa: 1415 (Ceuta)
- First Asia: 1498 (Calicut which is debatable as it was a trade post which does not mean owning the territory, so I would have to look further into it if the territory was officially theirs)
- First South America: 1500 (Brasil)
- First North America: ~1521 (Newfoundland outposts, I do not count Greenland and earlier newfoundland dates, as claiming is not owning)
- First Australia: never
So they cant be the first global empire, sorry to burst your buble.
those wars seem more in line with AOE 3 than with AOE 4.
Lmao they are literally historically recognized as the first global empire, by everyone except you. so Im just going to take your word for it.
American continent, African continent, European continent, Asian Continent and Oceania. Thats how they work.
Sorry to burst your bubble mate.
The Chinese civilization in Age of Empires IV is a thriving, unique civilization that grows through their dynasty system over the years 907-1644 CE.
Delhi Sultanate civilization is based on the powerful empire formed from the invasion of the Ghurid Dynasty (originating in Persia) into northern India spanning the years 879-1526 CE.
Age of Empires IV introduces the English civilization during the Anglo-Saxon era in Great Britain spanning from 850-1555 CE.
You witness the Mongols through the Ages, spanning from 1000-1500 CE
The French civilization in Age of Empires IV spans the years 840-1559 CE
In Age of Empires IV , the Abbasid Dynasty civilization spans the years 750-1517 CE
Seems to be within the timeline for me, considering Portugal had contacted/ fought the majority of the civs (bar mongols) by 1550
I could also add reconquista battles and northern morocco conquests, but i do find east asia more interesting, and also as an oportunity to ad another Indian civ with an european civ, in this case Portugal for another campaign for example.
3 Likes
" European exploration and settlement of Oceania began in the 16th century, starting with Portuguese settling the Moluccas and Spanish (Castilian) landings and shipwrecks in the Marianas Islands, east of the Philippines, followed by the Portuguese landing and settling temporarily (due to the monsoons) in the Tanimbar or the Aru Islands and in some of the Caroline Islands and Papua New Guinea, and several Spanish landings in the Caroline Islands and New Guinea"
3 Likes
Representing Portugal and Spain with the same civ is a joke.
Portuguese conquest of the Aztecs. Spanish occupation of Malacca.
5 Likes
Moluccas is not Australia continent. Also shipwrecks and temporary stays dont count towards actual territory held.
Which oceanic colonies did the portuguese have? East Timor is the only one you mentioned, but thats not in Oceania.
I don’t think that Genoa is an option, since it seems that Pavise crossbowmen are included in the French, which make sense since they often used Italian mercenaries.
I personally think that the first civs to add should be the byzantine, since they are a big hole in the game, and have ties with almost all other civs in the game.
My ideal DLCs would be:
-
Byzantines + Venetian Republic
-
Japanese + Koreans
-
Spanish + Aztecs
Norsemen too are a likely addition, since they are famous.
4 Likes
I think expansions would be 3 at a time not two, so for byzantines to be added I think they would be added with Norse, and either an Italian nation or Castile.