Within the name ‘Nomad’ and more recently in DE with Feet in the picture.
And I’m curious as to why it’s only implemented on a map to map basis rather than properly on all maps utilizing the same ‘turn on function’ as death match and regicide.
Within ‘locations’ on the HD version, it’s specifically labeled as Nomad, and that was the only map given for the game mode ‘Nomad’. within the original game.
African clearing? Mountain pass? Nile delta? Steppe?
So, A footsymbol and -1TC and -1Scout is enough for a separate gamemode?
because its map type and not a gamemode. imagine playing nomad on arabia. where would the players rescourses spawn? Arena: where will the vills spawn? Team island?
it’s a game mode that, with the current execution, seems to require allowing it on a map to map basis for it to work rather than blindly turning it on with all maps. because, like you said, it doesn’t make sense on all maps.
and yes, it is enough, especially when its own standard is given to, now, multiple maps.
Is Battle Royale available on every map? I didn’t think it was, but maybe it is on the official maps. (Conversely, I don’t think you can play anything other than Battle Royale on the Battle Royale maps.)
I think the idea of @TommoChocolate was from the arguement point of view that another example made with Br might clear the missconception that br would fit anywhere since it had or has his designated place but but the same thinking could be applied to nomad as it allready got his designated place and no one but you seem to complain about it
Saying there’s no one but me ignores that there are at least some people currently voting for the yes portion of the poll and that there are a good many out there who have yet to vote.
Having some support at the moment is a good improvement from the ‘no support’ claims I’ve received, and it shows the ‘no support’ crowed is false in assuming that there is no support for this.
ans its still in a major minority what should make a point that people dislike this idea more then liking it
technicly yes, but no i must say having some support is fine eventho you could just helped ya self (just a thought no accusation) and after all that little support is a fraction of people against it
the more people that vote the more the ‘for it’ votes are growing in terms of percentage vs those ‘against it,’ which is something I’ve expected for quite some time would happen. as for if we continue to get votes that’s another matter - let’s say the ‘for it’ votes reach 20% and then graph it as if it were all of our population in-game and in the forums, that’s still quite a few people. it may be until we reach a decent 800-1400 votes where we’ll start to see a shift happen as far as which will be the minority/majority, so I encourage lots of votes; the more votes the better.
Controversial idea that I starts to develop - Arabia, Arena and nomad should actually begone from the queue. Each mappool shift should introduce newer maps to allow strategic decisions.