Most people, myself included have portugal ranked as the worst civ currently so perhaps wait for it to be reworked because they are terrible on land.
I’m enjoying malta, the crossbow are ridicuously cost efficient and can be upgraded by 4 cards to the point they become better than even forest prowlers. Fire throwers are also very unique units, once you get the arsenal techs for the grenade area of effect and counter infantry rifling they just kill everything, I feel bad playing vs dutch when they go skirm/goon because both of them are countered heavily by fire throwers. Their age 4 card for rockets allows them to kite and counter skirmishers easily, the flamethrower card is quite fun as well just wait until some caroleans try and run at you and they get instantly melted.
asi es los malteses son bastante buenos y por eso los utilizo, pero bueno nada que hacer, como cierro esta discución? no quiero que se aleje mas este tema, yo por cierto quiero de vuelta el cassador del juego vainilla
Yeah, that units are the actual ones that need balance.
@StatelyPlayer64 Los aztecas no tienen un counter efectivo contra guerrilleros, menos contra los caçadores por su mayor armadura.
Los águila cuestan más, y una vez sin minas los aztecas lo pasan mal en cuanto a oro (75 cada ERK). No por nada son considerados una de las peores para tratado.
Otra opción son cañones a caballo con mosqueteros, con eso matas de manera muuuuy efectiva a los aztecas, ya que los flecha no son tan buenos matando artilleria.
As the other commenters have said without recs it is difficult to fully analyse the situation and it could be bad timing, and I agree that ports are not in a great spot.
My best take away is that in the situation described the fact that the opponent managed to pressure your base with such a strong mass means that there wasnt enough damage to their eco and often just having early raids (like 5 cav just hanging around near mine and hunts is enough to delay people.
Then you can build yourself up to the point where cassadors can shine (so 3 combat cards and guard upgrades) then combined with halbs or goons its a hard comp for aztec to do anything about.
this unit has always been broken since legacy tbh, and the card that gives them 16 range makes them even more broken haha xD
But erk compared to goons, i mean its not even comparable xD
I don’t think fire throwers are op though they are very expensive, 2 population and very low HP, it’s just infantry heavy civs like aztec and inca lack strong cavalry and also lack artillery both of which would kill them with ease.
joder tio, lei todo lo que escribi otra vez y no insultado a nadie, quizas decir que justifican lo roto seria lo más fuera de tono que he dicho en este hilo, pero más alla de ello no les he dicho nada, no se a quien has leido o a quien estas viendo
Algo que no se ve mucho son los Alabarderos, esta unidad es una buena opción contra los Caballeros Águila al tener estos un segundo tag de “Intantería de choque” y de echo son más baratos que los Caballero Águila (50f, 70c), obviamente en combo con Caçadores. Te lo digo como experiencia contra un chino, derritió a los Águilas con el combo Changdao/Arcabucero en el caso de Portugal sería Caçador/Alabardero.
veo que muchos hablan sobre los alabarderos, lo probare en otra ocasión, por cierto para parar a la rev de berberia solo hacen falta tener muchos escaramuzadores, los piratas berberiscos mueren facil con eso (holanda jode un monton con eso)
sorry but eagle knight is not tagged as shock infantery when it receives damage, only for receiving bonus.
for receiving damage is tagged as light ranged cavalry
for receiving bonus is all tags on the iu
A esta estrategia se le puede ganar si le matas a los monjes guerreros de la plaza, trata de derribar la plaza también, pero el combo tiene que ser guerrilla,cav y mosqueteros pero si esa estrategia es molesta un ff también suele funcionar yo digo que solo le tendrían que bajar la armadura al un 25 % pero nosé la verdad
