The 'without sense' of AOE-3 that should be corrected

[M00Z1LLA]

@UpmostRook9474

The Spanish are famous for their bullfights, but they have access to llamas instead of cows or cattle.

I had this idea for giving bulls to a few civs:

[Suggestion--rework] <Double Purpose Cattle of Europe>

I don’t think there needs to be a different breed of cattle for every faction, but I did have an idea for a second European cattle type that could be available to nations like Spain and Portugal who can’t train cows and could make for some interesting cards. Bulls Can fatten up to 700 food, and have greater health (greater health helps prevent them being sniped, African cattle could also benefit from this) Basically a toned down version of “Big Benny” for European Cattle (Big Benny should…

I’ve also seen a suggestion for some native allies having a passive bonus such as enabling or increasing the build limit of livestock. So a Quechua ally could allow you to make some Llamas, a Navajo ally could increase the sheep build limit, or an African ally could enable some cows.

@UpmostRook9474

We can introduce a similar unit called “Mongol” or “Mongolian Horseman” as a mounted archer mercenary to replace Manchu. Manchu can be a type of unit that only the Chinese can access, like a Chinese Isolationism unit, or a powerful unit that can only be obtained by shipping.

How about just flipping the role of Keshigs and Manchu? Keshigs seem more like an elite guard that would be more suited to be a mercenary.

@UpmostRook9474

Wolves are more of a unit that should be trained by Explorers, but I don’t mind TP having access to them too.

A tech for the Explorer to train them instead would be better. I’d like the second unit from the Tengri shrine to be the Mongol Scout, but with the added bonus of having a falcon ability like the AoE4 Khan.