I’m not normally a critic of the game, but what Franknezu said is true:
"If the company that develop the game have new investors, and didn’t even pay for moderators and censorship in fheir forums (they are volunteers), this company should also have enough money saved to fix the HUGE problems that have been plaguing the game since Season 1, and others that have been has been accumulating between seasons, and we have to be objective, THERE ARE ENOUGH:
-
There is still no distinct Fauna per biome (the same boar, wolfs and sheeps evey Biome).
-
Masteries of the Ottomans and Turks lack historical short facts in 11 of 15 of their challenges.
-
Masteries of Byzantines and Japanese LACK ANY historical short fact as prize for completion.
-
They forgot to give the Japanese Handcannoneer an arquebus, which should be Arquebusier Ashigaru.
-
The Japanese stone walls use the Chinese walls template, instead of the unique construction design that the Japanese walls should have, and which in fact are present in the base walls of the Castle Japanese Why not use that model for the walls as well?
-
Japanese cavalry shields should “Be Square” and not round.
-
It is not even known what historical unit the Wynguard Footman supposedly is. Is he a Sergeant? If they are supposed to be “Yeomen of the Guard”, they don’t dress like them.
-
The Wynguard Footman is a case of inventing a unit by recycling weapons and models from others, but without considering “Historical representation”. Instead, AoE 3:DE even “Innovates” new models for existing units to “Remaster” the game and make it more historically correct. That’s the direction they should take.
-
I am not against recycling units or weapons from the campaign for the game, but at least choosing good models, or making minimal changes to them to improve the historical representation of the unit that you want to represent.
-
Ottomans don’t have Horse Archer yet, they could use Akinci.
-
Ottomans still do not have unique technologies or unique units to represent the Azab, Silandar or Kapikulu or the Deli.
-
Byzantines still do not have Genoese Crossbowman, Armenian Cavalry or Aragonese Almogavar mercenaries. In the future, if these civilizations are released, it would be good for them to be considered for a 4th or 5th contract, because historically they were famous mercenaries of the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantines).
-
Regarding the special Spears that the French, Chinese and Mongolian spearmen have, they could consider that, like the Japanese Yari, it is a unique technology that definitively replaces the basic spear that these infantry have with some special ability.
-
Stop censoring the word ########### in the forum. I have to write it as T4n3g4sh1m4 because otherwise the autocorrector thinks it’s an insult, because in the autocorrector’s fantasy any word that has “Ne” in it is supposedly a reference to Africans, and “Sh1” they think they are saying die in Japanese, which is very idiotic. The Game even has a Landmark for Japanese in the fourth age (IV) with that name, at least correct your own program with exceptions. Is like in a Forum about Dragon Ball, you couldn’t write “Goku”, the name of the protagonist because the autocorrector of the forum thinks is a bad word in “Croatia”. Please, correct that as soon as possible