So you consider all the ethnicitys in the south asia region Indians?
1 Like
with giving them generic unupgraded battle elephants? absolutely nothing. as they wouldnt be used. however, that said
- it would require a significant redesign to give you the “Best Elephants in the game” that you want.
- such a redesign of a civilization has never happened before.
- such a redesign would come with significant nerfs from what your civ currently enjoys and could take months to balance properly.
and yet both of them use Archer units all the time. do you know how many infantry civs go archers quite a bit? aztecs, incas, vikings, celts, japanese, malians, all commonly use archers. don’t believe me about the meso ones?
(game 1 tatoh, aztecs, archers)(game 2, mbl, incas, goes archers)
1 Like
Why? What logic you are going through?
Which civilization have unupgraded Eagle Warriors, Steppe Lancer or Battle Elephants with no civ bonus?
Yes indeed search the term and see it’s meaning.
expensive, no bonuses, no elite battle elephant upgrade. why would you use it?
those civs are also balanced around having those units. you want upgraded battle elephants with bonuses on top of it?
1 Like
What should I do with those three games (the videos you posted) if I myself am unable to enjoy the game.
They didn’t pay for the game I bought, I paid for it from my pocket!!
Yes as all other battle elephant, eagle scout and steppe Lancer civs have.
so just because your civ isn’t portrayed 100% accurately you can’t enjoy the game?
like i said before that comes with several issues.
you’d have to completely redesign the entire civilization around that. show me one time that has ever happened.
1 Like
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
then why can’t you enjoy the game?
1 Like
I said no I am not able to enjoy it.
Why would I make this discussion otherwise?
i thought you were saying no to my question. well then i wish you luck but i’ll remind you of this.
- Khmer currently enjoy the best battle elephants in the game. they have been nerfed repeatedly.
- to give Indians the best BE in the game would require a large rework of the civilization, which is something that has never happened.
- be careful what you wish for.
1 Like
you can want change and still enjoy a game. there is changes i wouldn’t mind to the game, but i still enjoy the game a lot.
1 Like
Then repeatedly nerf Indians, just give them what they deserve. Also give them the Ship Sails.
Then do the rework. Just like a lot other civilizations have been reworked from HD to DE
Adding of new civs is even more unlikely.
I am just having two small requests, not asking for new civilizations, new units nothing. Asking what the Indians deserve:
- Their own Ship Sails, separate from the Berber ones.
- Battle Elephants like the Indo-Chinese civilizations.
1 Like
no civs got a massive rework. they got buffs and nerfs, but no reworks on the entire design of the civilization.
one of those is minor i agree. adding battle elephants and making them the best elephants in game is not a small request.
1 Like
Because you don’t like Indian civilization. Evident from the number of comments you have on this discussion. All opposing the change. Now the civilization that you don’t like is weird/broken. Ofcourse you will like the game.
1 Like
Kamandaran is not a complete rework of how Persians play?
Flaming Camels didn’t affect Timurids very sharply?
Koreans didn’t get massive change?
2 Likes
Is it how you talk to others on internet?
actually i do like the Indians, they are one of the most unique civs in the game.
i’m not against the change. i’m against just straight adding it without necessary adjustments to maintain balance.
they aren’t broken, they just aren’t designed the way you want them.
you don’t see the chinese people up in arms about the lack of gunpowder units on their civ do you?
you don’t see those from the goths up in arms about the design of their civ do you?
no. they changed one tech for another but that’s literally it. nothing removed. no changing civ bonuses. just a useless tech replaced with a good one.
no, and frankly tatars aren’t that great of a civ.
they got one change because they wanted them less tower focused and more army focused, in such a way that a bad civ could be made better.
you are asking for
- changing the civ from a non elephant civ into an elephant civ
- a bonus added to the civ to affect elephants (khmer have 2 bonuses for elephants, with only 1 bonus, a UT, you wouldn’t have the best elephants in the game).
- elephants added that they don’t currently have
- a current UT replaced with another one that affects elephants.
- re-balance accordingly.
notice the huge disparity there?
1 Like