I can’t call someone a r3t/\rd in game without being censored for the correct spelling when it’s been 47 minutes and they haven’t made a single military unit as flank, but it’s totally OK to have an innocent camel unit loaded with burning hay, to the point where you can literally hear the camel screaming in agony from the fire on its back until it dies from a suicide explosion?
So it’s not OK to expose kids to language such as “baboon” or “retard”, but it’s perfectly acceptable to expose them to horrific images of violence done to camels?
So you wouldn’t mind kids reading comics with ultraviolence in them, because theyre’ just comics???
How many games do you see with camels in them? If one of the few games which has realistic representations of camels in it portrays them as suicide bombers, then what kind of message is that sending to kids about camels?
cyberbullying] ! Must have missed out on this big ordeal of parents complaining to videogame company’s about this stuff to the point where companies have to censor it all. It would be good to allow a option to turn on or off in the game options or platform though
When did I say I was using personal attacks? I am talking about the use of harsh language being censored in any capacity, not making verbal attacks directed at specific people.
Personal attacks can be made without the use of harsh language, which are obviously not censored but could be worse…