And it looks like it produces pig.
I think it just working as all the drop off buildings at the same time with no drawbacks is a better idea.
Its not as convenient as it sounds
Maybe it’s something like the Honflagalas (spelling?) mechanic where you could produce cows and sheep from towncentres.
Who knows. Maybe it’s just a decorative building and we’re here revolutionizing the meta. 11
Congrats to all the Polish guys who love the game. Poles are deserved addition of the game. Seems with the civ design they also did well going for an infantry UU that deals with armor.
Im a little sad for the Georgians but now a Georgian/Armanian DLC is a posibility some day. But lets visit Africa and South Asia first.
If we are to ever come back to Europe again most sence to me makes Adriatic DLC with Serbs and Venice (possibly Croats).
PS, I dont think they will change the slavs civ name but with 3 subfactions now it makes even less sence than before. They should at least change the names of the AI players. Anyway Rus, Ruthenians would be much more appropriate name now.
- Polish Obuch tears down enemy armour
- Lithuanian Leitis ignores armour
???
Profit?
BTW, the Devs couldn’t write Jagiełło instead of Jogaila?
Starts? The Game was always more focused on europe, 20 years and all units still have european skins.
The units can be European looking, that really doesnt matter, the game has always been suposed to represent all the diferent regional powers of the middle ages
Around 50% of the Game are euro civs, they can represent all the World, but they are a lot more focused on europe. Not that i think it’s a wrong call.
The unit skins are one of the less important things in the Game, but they break the inmersión… i’m not saying de need more Unique units, but meso Warriors with full plated armor? They could have changed it a lot time ago
Before HD there was a balance beetwen Asia and Europe, and that balance was recovered by the time we got Rise of the Rajas with Europe being behind slightly by one civ but with a really good representation. Rn that balance is broken with Europe having as much civs as Africa and Asia combined and that feels so backwards.
Europe depite being far smaller, having far less cultural variety and being far far less powerful than Asia gets more civs and thats really stupid imo particularly considering we got Burgundians and Sicilians, two really niche civs just for the sake of more west Euro civs.
Btw how to you assign civs to continents like Bysantines, Huns, Cumans, for example. Which are Asian and which European.
Byz I consider them Euro because of their influence on eastern Europe as well as them being Romans at the end of the day, the other two I put with Asians as they were Khanates but honestly its complicated, just like Georgians would be a complicated civ to put in a category
Me parece genial que Microsoft siga demostrándole cariño al AoE II DE. Hace años esperé el momento de volver a disfrutar este juego. Sin embargo, para mi no es buena señal que lancen una expansión con nuevas civilizaciones descuidando el diseño arquitectónico para las nuevas civilizaciones. Con los sicilianos y los borgoñeses introdujeron cambios al castillo y los Donjons. Pese a que no me gustó el detalle igualmente apoyé el juego. Pero que a vuelvan a lanzar un DLC de pago de nuevo sin los cambios en la arquitectura me parece ofensivo.
Equipo de AoE, no descuiden esos detalles. Los jugadores que por años hemos comprado sus juegos merecemos recibir un producto de calidad. Las nuevas mecánicas están muy bien y la gente que quiere jugar al competitivo pues en enhorabuena. Sin embargo, existen personas que disfrutan de las campañas, del arte visual, sonoro y de por su puesto las buenas historias. Y en mi caso, yo quiero ver un estilo arquitectónico especifico para las civilizaciones de Bohemia y Borgoña para las casas, cuarteles, herrería, mercado y demás edificaciones.
Byzantines are Greek, and therefore European.
They had an European language, culture, religion and ethnic makeup.
Huns and Cumans were Turkic, so they are not European, nor could ever be.
Turks trying to get into the EU: ![]()
(btw, dont want to get political, just a joke)
Turks can never be European, and the EU does not want Turkey in it, because tehy still think they are the Ottoman empire, and are still too religious, not to mention that they would be a financial drain to the EU.
Algeria also wanted to be in the EU, when it broke off from France, but the EU declined, as it only wants European countries in it, and annexing a non-European country would raise concerns and cries about Neo-Colonialism.
Maybe it is some sort of mill which you can create sheep in that
This arent the reasons I heard tbh. From what I heard its more because Turkey has political problems with the EU mostly.
If I am not mistaken, historians do not know which ethnicity Huns belonged to because even though most, not all, Hunnic tribe names sound Turkic, the three words attested as Hunnic seem to have Indo-European origin.
Turkey’s political divergences with the EU, are cultural and deep rooted.
It cannot be ignored that they are an Asian Islamic society, so they would always be at odds with European Secularism and European culture.
We are too different, it would end up in tears.