Maybe, although that seems like a really lazy solution for me. Honestly Mexico has insurgente and soldado in Age II if you make the Chinaco similar to the naginata (talking about stats) he would still be solid and scale illegally good.
In my opinion that shouldn’t be the reason that Mexico is “bad”.
Yes haha. For me the ideal balance would be that the most difficult civs to use are in tier A and the easiest in tier B
Well, it’s a way to catalog civs from best to worst.
What would be then the way to measure how good is a civ?
So, that would make Mex a bottom civ still, right? Definitely not easy to use.
You may be right, but it’s not easy to predict either.
But why you need a standard heavy cav unit?? Japan or India dont have one for example while chinacos have a better anti infantry bonus. Why do you focus so much in using heavy cavalry to stop heavy cavalry??? Even, chinacos with their higher range are better in masses due to 2nd line chinacos can attack from behind
About Mexico being Spain 2.0… its like nobody said it in the past when it was announced, nothing new
the nerf from 1.25 to 1.2 of chinacos shall not change too much to the encounter. I doubt it make an additional blow difference.
I just recommend ppl confused in this unit also think about why war wagon beat goon, why cassador beat skim.
I like all of this generally, but I must comment on some of the additions to the revolts, Peru specifically. I think you leaned too heavily into the Inca theme on this one, which came at cost of having an opportunity to portray a uniquely Peruvian style of military and economy. I would consider either “Peruvianizing” the cards which are hardcopies of stuff from the Incans and/or adding in cards, as you did for Brazil and Argentina, which are wholly unique to the revolt. Keep some of the inca stuff, such as having an alliance with the Quecha, but also add some cards and features to make it feel like you aren’t just playing Inca-but-with arsenal upgrades.
Team game is not hard to balance.
Real difficulty is when some people here seeing you are talking about team game balance, they will go mad at once no matter your suggestion doesn’t refer 1v1 or even top players saying so.
If you start to talk about team game balance here, people will come to complain why are you so selfish, the game should only talk about 1v1, 1v1 has rank and tournaments. They don’t care team game has more people joining, also has rank and tournaments, but you are selfish if talking team here.
They also don’t care your opinion influences 1v1 or not, even you talk about team card they will rush to you and say why are you going to touch this civ, even this card never considered in 1v1.
Tried many times and not only one people had this behaviour.
FP gets 22 range. 20 characters
The problem with the Peru revolution, specifically how it leans to too much into the Inca theme is also similar to the problem of the Haiti revolution.
Haiti, a revolution that throws the shackles off and rebels against the French to become the 19th century black majority civ leans too much into the centuries out of date (unrelated) buccaneer history. Pirates and the Brethren of the Coast/Letters of Marque shipments have nothing to do with Haiti.
Also, not a good Revolution choice for the Brit. A ‘Pirate Republic’ rev would make more sense for them (and possibly more), though I’d still not include Letters of Marque as that reference makes more sense for Euro nations (they’re commissions/contracts for Buccaneers/Privateers, no outright criminal pirates - enemies to all!).
So? This requires an expensive research not by default you know?
Why don’t you say abus is age2 unit with 36 siege attack only increase 5 gold in this PUP?
Malta full upgrade is the strongest skirm type unit you don’t say? (Not means Malta is OP)
You only aim on second few use civ and say their remain better unit should be nerfed? To you native should have worse eco worse unit? To you is balance?
Your favor Japan has ashi 4.5 speed more than general without any research why don’t you say to nerf their status?
Your bias speech is so ugly for 2 years why can’t you stop this.
Please stop saying something better means they need to be nerfed. Your Japan has much more bonus many should say to nerf.
Let me use your logic to reply you.
Japan has Daimyo aura, their unit basic attack should -3%
Japan has Golden Pavilion, their unit basic status should -3%
Japan has bank, vils gathering gold mine should -3%
Japan has shrine, vils gathering rate should -3%
Ashi 4.5 % more than general 4, their basic status should -3%
Yabusame 45% RR and x7 against artillery, should nerf these two bonus as general dragoon
more and more…
Don’t say anything they are weaker because you also can’t see from other civs.
This is not viable, but San Martin with all the Spanish cards is basically the best Cuirassier in the game.
Considering that the card would seem to be unique to the Argentine revolution, the developers could change the name of the card and the appearance of the unit.
Another unit that I would love to see would be the Güemes Infernales, they are practically a unit that could occupy almost any position in the game. As cavalry units they could use lassos, lances and sabers, as infantry units they could use rifles with bayonets, they specialized in guerrilla tactics and kept Spanish incursions at bay for 11 years.
Regarding the new cards of the Argentine revolution, I think that the developers gave us an excellent patch and substantially improved the revolution, it seems that they invested a lot of time and effort. I thank you for this patch and forgive me if my previous requests sound like discontent, I assure you that is not the case. 
I think the infernals would be a bit too much, in terms of content bloat. The revolution design has everything it needs to be usable by the 3 civs that can revolt into it, and has enough tools to be used in a reasonable window of time. After all, revolts are an all in assault that turns eco power into military power.
If there were to be an Argentine civ Infernals should be a card that turns gauchos into Infernales.
Don’t you think they could be a substitute, for example, for the Spanish Lancer?
I mention this unit because the new shipment brings it for all civilizations, but it comes without being able to be improved and cannot be trained. In the case of Italy, you can access the papal lancer, but you cannot train him, he takes too long to arrive and is very expensive for a revolution. In the case of Germany, I don’t know of units that are affected by the caballeros card and that can be trained, in the best case you could have the Elmetto, but it is very expensive to produce.
I see your point, maybe 3 or 4 unique units for a revolution is a lot, but I’d like to see the Infernal become part of the game. (Obviously this is just my opinion)
poruchik card for russia doesnt appear on the PUP, but on the notes only
pleaaaaaaaase provide on each pup notes a way to copy and paste hotkeys on the folders…
also options configuration copy and paste, idk why they are not automatically the same that the normal game.
Zouve and armored pistoleer are still neither worth 3 or 4 pop.
Zouves are 3 pops because the US card for new york is the problem, not the zouaves themselves.
Is this a nerf late game or all buffs? What did their upgrades scale from before?
I think it’s a hard late game nerf, but a substantial early game buff.
