Poles is part of Europeans so the developer team only need to consider how players from Poland and rest of the europe feel.
Yes but do you understand that before you play aoe3? You think who let people understand that? People actually have native blood and people know a lot about natives? Or casual players on a forum?
With same developer and similar target market.
You know what, you and the other guy keep emphasizing how important and relevant the opinions of the player group you represent, I really want to stop arguing with you guys, do whatever you want, you win.
This post is for Hephthalites tech tree ideas. Go create your own Tibetan post.
You mean the chinese player base will get upset.
This is a game catering a global audience not one community of people or a political entity.
How global are you? You represent global? At least put some history knowledge into your head and use them to argue instead of keep saying how you feel like. Who was upset when Iroquois was a name? Global audiences??
Yes I am part of the global community who looks at a game from a gaming point of view and not current geopolitical view.
Like arguing a 19th century English name is better than a 7th century local name? I really don’t understand your logic.
This sounds very “current geopolitical” to me.
And I hope you can read.
This is really silly you are typing in english which is the language most people on this forum can understand and yet want the chinese term used for a civi name.
Why are you using the term hepthalites for this civi and not the historically accurate name used back then?
20 characters limit.
What we need is the Huns to have a different building set, a proper nomadic one to share with the Mongols and we could go with the Huns in both Asia and Europe. Currently, they use a Eastern European build set.
It’s called common sense. Also why are you so combative? Are you from China by the way?
Some additional resources on Tibetans.
I already make it very clear this is a civ representing central aisa buddist states before Turkification and Islamization, not a subdivision of Huns, and I don’t understand why you still stubornly want to make them one. Tuetons and vikings are not merged into Norse because people take them as two different culture. Even if you consider Hephthalites and Huns of east Europe as the same people(which is arguable) they are sill two complete different culture. If you classify euro civ so precise that even slavs and poles are two different civs you should use the same standard on Asia, Am I clear enough? I put my explanation of Hephthalite at the very front of this post and some people just keep ignoring it. You guys keep saying what you think is right according to how you know the world, and don’t even bother list logical proof. Your common sense looks more like internet public opinion, which 90% of the “public” probably never even read a single word outside of wikipedia.
Again who are “we”, people don’t even know when central asia get Turkified and Islamed ?
It’s not even a solid fact that Europe Huns and “Asia Huns” are the same, it’s just the people you represent believe they are. Even the game dev try to avoid the uncertain of fact by limiting the Huns in the game as the Huns in east europe. Why you keep taking your own opinion as a fact? As if everyone should acept it.
It’s called YOUR common sense, if you want to make it fact, use solid proof. I’m tired of reading what you feel is right. I put ideas here not for people to express what they feel is right, but for meaningful communication.
The onyl place they spread their version of Buddism is Mongolia and that is after the Gengiskan times. China get Buddism from the silk road which doen’t pass Tibetan plateau, plus China get Budhism earlier than Tibet. Tibetan wasn’t even Budhism when they were still an empire. The conversion of Buddism is the main reason why they were no longer good at military. And actually most of Tibet’s culture formed after the collapse of “Tibetan Empire”, including the most important Epic of King Gesar。
When they control middle silk road, Buddism in central asia was almost over and the time of a Islamic central Asia was coming. Tibet was almost the last place Buddism arrived in Asia.
You are highly arrogant.
Do you even know why Tangut people came out of a “mighty empire”, if California came out of US and become influencial in the world, do you think that proves US is mighty and loved by Californians? If Tanguts considered themselves as Tibetans why didn’t they seek to rule Tibet(which by Tangut’s time is already very weak in military power), instead tried to influence China?
Have you even read them yourself? If you have you can just use the information in the book as your proof, instead of putting books name.
