Oh boy Aussie_Drongo made a video about this forum and you guys

“Peace and unity” being the same <10 people here liking whatever crap each other says, and claiming to be the majority while considering themselves as superior to any other forum.

3 Likes

This is projection, friend.
I never said that this is “the better forum” and my reading that I am in the majority, in this case, comes from actually talking to the playerbase.

Unrealistic and no one ever claim it.

1 Like

Where? When?

Do you mean other users or?

I never said this, but don’t think I believe we are all equal :slight_smile:

2 Likes

“Peace and unity” is just hanging above your head, and you even liked that comment.

All the rest are said by our old friend whose reddit comments I posted earlier. That’s the one (not the one I quoted in that reply) who believes this forum is superior to reddit, then yelling he got bullied because people downvoted him, and then claiming to be the majority because people upvoted him. And what was your response on that? “He’s not wrong”.

So why did you reply to me? LOL

1 Like

Not saying “you” personally, but “you” as a group.

which group is this?

1 Like

Funny, because you are now just applying labels to me, even though I never said anything related to either Peace or Unity.

He did say this, but not this:

He is not a forum, and he never said he was a superior person, only taht the forum here is superior.
It is an opinion I do not share, but it should still not be misrepresented.

He isn’t. His whinning may be, but his premises is not. USA was a bad call.

2 Likes

HE may think i said that about this forum, but I was attributing it to echo chambers - of which this forum is not.

1 Like

I see, so if someone is sh*tting on the street and yelling “US is a bad civ” then you’ll still defend him right?

And going back to the “majority”.
The “majority” means <10 people who usually comment on this topic in this forum?

He will be wrong about public defecation, but right about the US in AoE3.
I do not need to defend him, just point out where he is right.

Bad example, and honestly just shows you are the one with the tribal mentality.

6 Likes

First reaction of the majority towards seeing people sh*tting on the street is “that is bad” not “what he’s yelling at the same time is not wrong”.

Similarly, first reaction towards “asking people to downvote someone when also accusing people who downvoted him as bullying him at the same time” is “this is not logical” not “he’s whining about the right thing”.

First reactions are just like first impressions: powerful and most often wrong.

I think we are way past first reactions. We do not live in reactionary societies anymore, those were not scientifically advanced, and died out.

And this is the perfect example of non-answer.
Prove why first impression is wrong and this particular first impression is wrong.

Because if we saw someone pooing outside while screaming we would not care about his actions but see what is wrong (duh).

You would call police/emts to help the guy out

1 Like

First impressions are skin deep and reactionary, so they cloud proper judgement.
While many see mold and discard food, the physician sees penicillin.

If we were still clinging to primary instincts, we would be still living in caves.

That’s direct contradiction to what you said here.
And you agreed on each other instantly.
Definitely nothing tribal here.

The physicians discovered penicillin from mold (seriously, that’s criminally oversimplified) but they still would not eat any bread with mold on it.

We did not agree, we just saw each others different viewpoints, and saw some value to each of them.

You can like an answer you do not necessarily agree with. To only specifically like what resonates with your own worldview, is narrow minded.

Still managed to turn what others saw as waste, into a valuable resource. Proves first reactions are wrong, often.

No. It is still wrong, but it wouldn’t be the defecation that is cause for concern but rather the combination of this and screaming

1 Like