Siege engine crew, workhorses

[Darkness01101]

@Spyken1

Cosmetic dlc?..

Seriously?..

No!!!

I do not buy any cosmetic dlc, it is basicaly garbage and will make me lose interess of the game. ( unless it is a Starcraft game, where there is only 3 unique race that we play over and over again)

Siege enginear need to be a game mecanic, not just a cool art look.

Or just remember it’s a video game, and trebs moving on their own happen in such things

I bet you would buy siege crew DLC because in your eyes, it wouldn’t be garbage. You clearly need cosmetic art look for your siege, based on your comments.

PS: What happens when expensive DLC known as “an expansion pack” comes out? Still garbage? Why is $24.99 DLC not garbage and $1.99 DLC is? You’ve just bought into the stigma/stereotype against “DLC” and assumed it is bad in 100% of cases, is all. Yet you will buy a $24.99+ DLC expansion pack if one ever comes out, I guarantee it

@PlumpDucklin

is this true? I wonder… people might accept the lack of crew, but I doubt a majority of the actual player base would say no to siege crew .

Yeah, quite a few likes to the following thread compared to the one we’re in

I don't care about siege not having little men around

Felt the need to make a thread about this, as I see way too many people complaining about it. Maybe you’re not familiar with the genre, but this game is an RTS. If you want to be immersed in medieval warfare, maybe you could give the Total War series a try. That’s closer to reimagining battles and the atmosphere on a battlefield, and there’s very little micro to stand in your way. RTS is not about watching little men reload a cannon, it’s about duking it out with your opponent in a battle of spe…

@PlumpDucklin

Of course I’m biased and support option 3. Because it worked for aoe3.

Debatable, as I highly disagree