Okay
it doesn’t, CA doesn’t fight crossbow because CA can choose when to fight and simply only pick optimal fights
tournaments are played with civ draft, often meaning no mirrors. as for the meta, huns as a whole has become weaker by comparison, not the CA. They used to be S tier by themselves, now they’re A tier with just about everyone worth a damn.
uh. Seriously? he had the archer techs already, he has the discount on the CA because he’s the huns and the resources on the south side of the base were range-able? Do you want me to explain everything that happened in the game to help you get inside a player’s head?
statistically speaking, they aren’t. They have an about average winrate against the top CA civs. If they did, however.
obviously having good knights is not a downside. the problem clearly has to do with the lack of, and expense of, their other tools to handle problems. any CA civ needing to push the franks can blend in halbs and every answer a frank would have for Halbs requires gold.
Taxe, Hc, and either siege option is a gold investment which is hard to fund while also pumping paladins. and to be Frank, if you aren’t into your Paladins against a CA army you’re just screwed frankly, therefore a CA civ can win by denying your opponent a chance to reach them. This is not a refutation of their paladins, it’s a great example of CA’s very polarizing strengths and an expose of the weakness of the frank tech tree.
I’m happy we’re clearing this up now so I can not do this again. Imagine trying to have a cordial discussion with someone who immediately goes ad hominem when he dislikes what bad man say.