Can’t you see that I have separated the Egyptians from the rest of the Arabians civ???
Are you really forbidding me from dreaming of adding civs to this game that were very relevant to the timeframe of AoE 3? One civ for all German nations is the same crime as one Indian civ - if you don’t understand that, it’s not my problem.
By the way, it is much easier to convert Germans civ into Austrians civ than Indians civ into some Indian nation, e.g. Mughals (because Indians civ have content from different parts of India stuffed into one civ, Germans civ don’t).
Of course, I’m a evil European… 
Yes, but many key European civs are still missing. In addition, there are huge inequalities between European civs - some have a lot of content (e.g. Italians civ) while others have little (e.g. Portuguese civ).
I’ve never been against non-European civs, and I think future DLCs should focus on Asia and Africa. It’s not up to me what the developers’ publishing plan will look like.
Now to the haters. I know the history of Europe best, so I create proposals for European civs, I guess it’s not a bad thing. I guess it’s definitely better to do what you know, than if I had to come up with stereotypical Asian civs proposals that some people complain about being stereotypical.
Do what you like, don’t force it. In the case of non-European civs, I say what civs might interest me, but I don’t make topics about them because I don’t want to do something that will be completely poorly prepared.
Instead of criticizing me for creating European ideas for this game, maybe you’d better start making similar ones based on other parts of the globe.
