I dont think that it will surely be balanced but cheap terrible paladins may end up just fine (they have to be very very bad ofc)
We already have Byzantine and Celtic palas for bad ones.
Well, I mean basically cheap Byz or Celt paladin
Look at the first sentence of this post and read your own sentence again:
This thread isnt about which civ we think, but about which civ we want. This is clearly stated in the first sentence of this thread.
What i want is no new civs. That is my answer on the question in the poll. I want to advice the devs to stop adding new civs. I got tired of all the new civs.
You can disagree with my opinion (Feel free to disagree), but it is at least an answer to the question in the first post.
Extra pierce armor paladins… 
(joke, before anyone gets angry)
Also we don’t have Paladins which get Bloodlines but are missing Plate Barding Armor yet. With self-healing they could be very unique and not op (depending on the healing rate of course 11)
Top picks are still bohemians and polish 
6 Likes
I honestly just hope they are diferent enough from Lithuanians.
Otherwise rather not have them honestly
1 Like
no Duchy of Austria? 
feels sad man
1 Like
No, The Serbians created the first Hussars, not the Magyars and Poles.
The hussars reportedly originated in bands of mostly Serb warriors, crossing into southern Hungary after the Ottoman conquest of Serbia in the late 14th century.
The word hussar stems from the Hungarian huszár, which in turn originates from the medieval Serbianhusar (Cyrillic: хусар, or gusar , Cyrillic: гусар), meaning brigand (because early hussars’ shock troops tactics used against the Ottoman army resembled that of brigands; in modern Serbian the meaning of gusar is limited to sea pirate)
4 Likes
wallachians should be added with the poles (replacing the bohemians) bc i feel like there are more aplications of the civ ig
2 Likes
What would they contribute. They were mostly moving around place to place, generally under the subjugation of the local reign (Hungarians, Bulgarians, later Turks).
2 Likes
Michael the brave made it from istanbul to vienna and prague while defeting the mastermind behind the ottoman victories against the holy league in the early 1600s, mircea the elder delt a serious defeat to the turks at rovine while also attacking and annexing dobrogea into wallachia and finnaly stephen the great was a military mastermind who won 48 out of 50 battles he had fought in, he defeated the tatars and stopped their raids into the country, he defeated matthias corvinus, the king who had brought hungary to its golden age, while john hunyadi led his armies to defend belgrade from the ottomans while also launching the varna crusade. There are many wallachian heroes that would rlly need a spolight in aoe2
Is it possible to add to the game
? 
6 Likes
Aoe 3 time frame right?
1 Like
kinda in the middle but still
Forgot add Vlachs AKA Wallachians 
2 Likes
Romanians shoud be present in the poll at least
2 Likes
I voted Poles and Bohemians because, while I would like Armenians and Georgians more, I think those don’t really fit the description of the expansion, they are more suited for a Caucasus themed one
9 Likes
Bohemians confirmed on Steam.
11 Likes